The textbook for the Art Appreciation class I taught last year offered a chapter on protest art, an umbrella term encompassing artwork related to contestation – from caricatures of the 18th and 19th century to Pussy Riot performances. I asked students: why do the first examples of protest art – according to the textbook, at least – came into existence only a couple of centuries ago? Was conflict not there before, or perhaps it didn’t employ art? While this depends on the definition we choose for conflict and for art, what is normally conserved and transmitted through time is institutionally sponsored art; if it expresses conflict, that will be with other institutions and it would definitely not be considered protest art today. This led to an interesting discussion on how conflict and art intersect and how protest can be even identified in past cultural phenomena.
- If you like Frida Kahlo so much that you like to dress like her, please read this. dazeddigital.com/art-photograph… 24 minutes ago
- Why a fashion magazine with no photos is super cool, but really, pointless. parasolphotography.wordpress.com/2020/01/22/pho… 1 day ago
- Does the label "theory driving test" make you squirm a little? I know it's in opposition to "practice test" but, he… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 6 days ago
- Super stoked about this symposium happening at the @CCP_UArizona this weekend and proud to have my photographic wor… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 6 days ago
- Glad to see this museum project addressing visually impaired visitors in Milan museums. Sad to see that it was deve… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago