The textbook for the Art Appreciation class I taught last year offered a chapter on protest art, an umbrella term encompassing artwork related to contestation – from caricatures of the 18th and 19th century to Pussy Riot performances. I asked students: why do the first examples of protest art – according to the textbook, at least – came into existence only a couple of centuries ago? Was conflict not there before, or perhaps it didn’t employ art? While this depends on the definition we choose for conflict and for art, what is normally conserved and transmitted through time is institutionally sponsored art; if it expresses conflict, that will be with other institutions and it would definitely not be considered protest art today. This led to an interesting discussion on how conflict and art intersect and how protest can be even identified in past cultural phenomena.
- At this point, I am not sure how photography of Romani communities contributes further to photography culture or ma… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
- RT @GavJacobson: '"cultural Marxism” is not only a sad diversion from framing legitimate grievances but also a dangerous lure in an increas… 2 days ago
- RT @5easypieces: New post! "On selfie museums and empty calories": kovenjsmith.com/post/on-selfie… Triggered partially by the experience of this ho… 3 days ago
- The applications for the New York Portfolio Review @nyphotoreview are now open! nytimes.com/2018/11/12/len… 3 days ago
- RT @CleoHanaway: Delighted to announce that I, along with several colleagues from a variety of disciplines, have set up a ‘Senses’ research… 4 days ago
- Art and Activism (book review)
- Two Italian Masters
- Possible Convergences
- The Museum of Home Touch
- Neighborhoods of the Heart
- Hidden ID at Savignano sul Rubicone, Italy
- Do you collect photos of people you don’t know?
- Disappeared and back again
- Fashion photography in a new light (Bruce Weber at the Dallas Contemporary)
- Liquid Shadows, a solo exhibition at Langdon Center, Tarleton State University