The textbook for the Art Appreciation class I taught last year offered a chapter on protest art, an umbrella term encompassing artwork related to contestation – from caricatures of the 18th and 19th century to Pussy Riot performances. I asked students: why do the first examples of protest art – according to the textbook, at least – came into existence only a couple of centuries ago? Was conflict not there before, or perhaps it didn’t employ art? While this depends on the definition we choose for conflict and for art, what is normally conserved and transmitted through time is institutionally sponsored art; if it expresses conflict, that will be with other institutions and it would definitely not be considered protest art today. This led to an interesting discussion on how conflict and art intersect and how protest can be even identified in past cultural phenomena.
- Great question for phenomenology, speculative realism and new materialism to consider. And of course, theory of pho… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
- Deirdre O'Leary's work at Villa Sucota (Como) and Artists' Research Lab at the Ratti Foundation last night. https://t.co/xiCNXBlnrr 3 days ago
- RT @CallieCrossley: You know “less is more” - the minimalist maxim. But new exhibit at the ICA is turning that saying on its head. We visit… 3 days ago
- RT @Monroegallery: These photographs from a new exhibit @SFMOMA make the most of getting it wrong po.st/6FE5kk via @SmithsonianM… 5 days ago
- Doodling, global style. twitter.com/DanteNevante/s… 1 week ago
- The Haunted Archive
- Art and Activism (book review)
- Two Italian Masters
- Possible Convergences
- The Museum of Home Touch
- Neighborhoods of the Heart
- Hidden ID at Savignano sul Rubicone, Italy
- Do you collect photos of people you don’t know?
- Disappeared and back again
- Fashion photography in a new light (Bruce Weber at the Dallas Contemporary)